Mile Durkheim is pointed as one of first the great theoreticians of sociology, and its ideas are essential for the understanding of the reality of the social world. Durkheim allowed that sociology was emancipated of the social philosophy, it placed and it as a new disciplines autonomous worker, characterized for the scientific and methodological severity. Still, it defined with clarity the types of events on which the sociologist would have to support itself (the social facts). It is by means of this author who sociology was presented to the university, conferring to this disciplines its due academic recognition. Additional information is available at Jonathan Friedland. The same objective in if conferring to sociology a scientific reputation it occurred in the figure of Max Weber. During all its intellectual life, insisted on establishing a clear distinction between the scientific knowledge, fruit of careful inquiry, and the judgments of value on the reality.

With this it desired to designate that a scientist did not have the right to possess, from its profession, preferences politics, religious or ideological. Beyond having elaborated works in diverse areas of the knowledge, its ideas regarding the paper of the methodology of the scientific research had been basic for the development of social sciences. Its writings had generated a methodological source (interpretative) and had inspired some chains of the sociological thought of century XX. The objective of this work is the quarrel of some of the methodological contributions of the related authors, from the following questionings: ) Which the main methodological contributions which Durkheim and Weber had brought to the development of sociology as science? b) Exist convergence points enter the positivist sociology of Durkheim and the interpretative sociology of Weber? c) It is possible to get a scientific neutrality in social sciences?

In each individual case must be considered a point of human evolution and its individual dependency list: medical, social, psychological. To overcome the ability to obey any influence, restricts the freedom of life itself is not fundamentally dependent. Here the main thing – to decode the program of the soul in a particular personal context, as well as implementing a human major life lessons, and only then choose effective tools to restore the integrity and harmony of the individual. And believe me, artificially rid of any relationship (with the help of hypnosis, suggestive techniques, drugs, under fear of death or punishment) you are not working on the very reason, thereby giving rise to a backward wave with repeated remission, regression or the appearance of new states and subordinate reactions. Also, substitution of one dependence (smoking, alcoholism, drug addiction, gambling), other, more positive activities (sports, hard physical labor), performs a social role in "humanizing" without affecting the underlying existential issues personality. Any dependence of the falls, one way or another, under a certain category: physical, emotional, emotional and physical, emotional, mental and proper mental. Respectively, and approaches to address or get rid of a certain effect will be different. While one rule remains the same as in medicine: the need to treat not the disease, and restore health, or in other words, does not work with investigators, but with the root cause. In the case of dependence needs to find its origins and mechanisms for managing a specific person, and only then choose the appropriate and adequate "treatment." If you are aware of the detrimental effect of any – or You subordinate factors, conditions, states, or habits that limit your creativity, healthy and active life, but you own to overcome their difficult, then you can take advantage of these recommendations in full through a session of the Spiritual Coaching or counseling.