Competition Law

Posted by Toni - October 31st, 2023

A kit beer for the environment protecting them 1 m rainforest. Newcastle University understands that this is vital information. The Krombacher rainforest promotion runs from May 1 until 31.07.2002. During this period in Dzanga Sangha rain forest is protected with each purchased Kasten Krombacher 1 m sustainably. This ensures the WWF Germany.\” This slogan originates from a Krombacher advertising campaign, you know. This campaign is supported by numerous promotional activities.

\”So you can, for example, a T-Shirt reading for the rain forest\” order. For more information, see… . Competitively, this campaign is very critical to look at. Competition law is not only for large corporations, but especially for young entrepreneurs in many very confusing. It is often dependent on each case, also lacks often the time and legal expertise, understanding of competition law in its depth and to combine the paragraphs. Gunther Jauch promises us in prominent example advertising, that we with a crate of Krombacher environmental able to protect. Consumers imagine a hassle-free transaction including the Krombacher in cooperation with the WWF pro of sold box Krombacher buys beer, one square meter of rainforest and protects from deforestation and other threats.

And that for 100 years. Overall, Krombacher so appeals to the good conscience towards the environment. However the real process is not this average consumer idea and that’s why Krombacher received an indictment for breach of competition rules. In fact a general donation per sold Kasten Krombacher to the WWF held namely, who then uses them to protect already protected rain forests continue to. This is done by supporting the resident Ranger\”, explains Theresa Schade, Marketing Assistant in marketing consulting team Vinco, that is to say, not directly increases the amount of protected rain forest. Furthermore are donated by the 11.50 euros per Kasten Krombacher beer only 6.7 cents to the WWF. So not enough money to actually 1 m to protect Rainforest for centenary sq.\”a clear deception of consumers and thus a breach of competition law.

Tags: ,

Control And Parental Benefit: What Is Important To Note It?

Posted by Toni - December 17th, 2021

Three sentences to the jurisprudence around the parental allowance tax refunds are irrelevant for calculating parents money, was the Federal Social Court. The Court also ruled that the tax to be calculated in determining the parents money plays a role. Salary payments are also taken into account. The amount of parental benefit is only dependent on the previous monthly net income of the appropriate parent. Tax refunds for the previous year are not included in the calculation. After receiving their income decisions, an applicant had prompted to recalculate of their parents money claim. The application was dismissed and the State social Court has confirmed this decision in the appeal proceedings (AZ.: L 5 EC 4/10).

In the explanatory statement, it was said that the parental allowance is used, before the birth of the child to the living producing income to replace that. However, tax refunds are not essential for the standard of living in the relevant period of twelve months. More Parents money falls to be tax when determining weight by changing the tax bracket because in principle underlies parents money calculate the average monthly income. The Federal Social Court in two cases decided that the change caused by married women of the wage tax class is allowed during pregnancy (AZ.: B-10 EC 3/08 R and R 4/08). Both the change had resulted in lower monthly tax deductions from the wages and ultimately a higher parental benefits. The Court found the behavior of young mothers right ethically reprehensible, nor quite unfair, because the corresponding control class change is allowed.

Salary payments are taken into account as opposed to extraordinary payments as Christmas, and holiday pay or bonuses are not to take into account in the calculation of the parental benefit, must subsequently pay payments will be included in the calculation. So decided the Hessian Regional social Court (AZ.: L 6 EC 16/09). In the underlying case unlawful no salary has been paid out before the months of birth a woman who worked for four years as a salesperson. The employer paid her due to a controversial labour certificate the pending wage only after a legal dispute. The competent State supply Office had not taken account of first payment calculating the parents money. The judges of both instances however approved the woman. Because the parental allowance is to a wage compensation, also paid to wage must be included in the calculation. Mark Schmidtke

Tags: ,